Performance
65 / 100
Needs investigation
Sample technical audit · Our own website
A genuine report starts with genuine measurements.
Below is a limited public technical audit of the Auxaris homepage, completed on 18 October 2026. We are showing findings from our own website, including where we need to improve. A customer audit also includes the agreed URL list, evidence and prioritised next steps in a dated PDF.
Explore the £99 audit ↗Measured results · Mobile Lighthouse
The numbers behind the advice.
Accessibility
95 / 100
Contrast issue flagged
Best practices
100 / 100
No Lighthouse issues flagged
Basic SEO checks
100 / 100
Not a ranking score
Mobile loading measurements
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.7 seconds
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 seconds
Total Blocking Time: 0 milliseconds
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
These are laboratory readings from a single mobile-profile run. Scores and timings fluctuate and do not replace real-user monitoring. No Chrome UX Report field data was available for this test.
Actual findings
What we would recommend fixing.
High priority
Slow main content
Lighthouse measured 9.7 seconds for LCP. Identify the exact LCP element and inspect page delivery before making changes to the hero assets, scripts or hosting.
Medium priority
Unused JavaScript estimate
The test highlighted approximately 309 KiB of potentially unused JavaScript. Inspect the coverage report and embedded services before conditionally loading anything; do not remove customer-facing features without testing.
Medium priority
CSS delivery opportunity
The test identified approximately 29 KiB in possible savings from CSS minification. Review the built theme styles and validate changes against mobile layouts.
Medium priority
Contrast accessibility
At least one foreground/background colour combination did not meet the Lighthouse contrast check. We would locate the affected element in accessibility tooling before adjusting styling.
Other public checks
WordPress search visibility was enabled during review. WordPress sitemap output and robots.txt were present. All 19 image attachments checked had a stored alt-text value, although those values were not assessed for usefulness. The active plugin list did not show a dedicated SEO plugin; theme metadata is present, so that absence alone is not a problem.
This example is not a security penetration test, a full accessibility certification, a full SEO crawl or proof that fixes have already been made. Recommendations should be re-tested before and after approved implementation.
Your website deserves the same honesty
Get a report based on your actual site.
Up to five agreed public pages. A dated PDF. Prioritised, actionable recommendations. £99 fixed starting scope.